Mr K Jarrett V Aberdeen City Council: 4115871/2014 - Gov.uk

Top London & UK & Ireland & Scotland & Wales Weed From

Mr K Jarrett V Aberdeen City Council: 4115871/2014 - Gov.uk. Mr s f farquhar v aberdeen city council: Unlawful deduction from wages, working time regulations.

So it was that in laurie v british steel corporation [1988] slt 17, a decision of the outer house of the court of session which was later approved by the house of lords in miles v wakefield metropolitan district council [1987] 2 wlr 795, it was held that if employees had refused to carry out the work for which they were employed, they could not call on their employers to pay them. These include graham v gordon, 1843, 5 d 1207; His behavioural history must be known to the defenders who had responsibility for his education both while he was at carden school and. The cases illustrate the wide. The question of when and the principles by which an amendment may be made to a notice of appeal before this tribunal were considered by the appeal tribunal, chaired by hhj serota qc, in khudados v. Read the full decision in mr d mcghee v aberdeen city council: Remits the matter to the respondents to. In this summary application the pursuer craves reversal of the decision by the aberdeen city council licensing committee to refuse the pursuer's application to them for renewal of a taxi driver's licence. The purchase price was £365,000, but it was subject to a possible uplift in the events described in clause 9 of the missives. I considered them, and, after hearing mr mundy's response for the council, indicated that i refused the applications and would give my reasons as part of this judgment.

The question of when and the principles by which an amendment may be made to a notice of appeal before this tribunal were considered by the appeal tribunal, chaired by hhj serota qc, in khudados v. Employment appeal tribunal judgment of mr justice langstaff on 3 november 2016. The subjects comprised an area of about 11 acres lying to the north of the b9119 public road at westhill, aberdeen. He did accept that there was a risk, but it was certainly lower than that opined on by mr fry. Read the full decision in mr k jarrett v aberdeen city. Nor, can it be properly said, in our view, that the allegation relating to the phrase female friend. 4115812/2014 mr s cairney claimant aberdeen city council respondents judgment the claim is struck out under rule 37 of the rules contained in schedule 1 of the employment tribunals (constitution and rules of procedure) regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d). Aberdeen city council between april 2014 and march 2017. Read the full decision in mr r johnstone v aberdeen city council: Last updated 12 november 2021 + show all updates. 4115923/2014 mr j milne claimant aberdeen city council respondents judgment the claim is struck out under rule 37 of the rules contained in schedule 1 of the employment tribunals (constitution and rules of procedure) regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d).